Loch Ness Monster used to debunk evolution

[badmafa]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

It's not bullshit. It's completely valid from a scientifical point of view.

Of course, sweetie. Now go back to your sandbox.

[CynthiaCrescent]

Originally Posted by badmafa

Of course, sweetie. Now go back to your sandbox.

Sandbox <3

[Pwntlolz]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

It's not bullshit. It's completely valid from a scientifical point of view.

a. scientifical isn't even a word and in using it so much you show that you could have gone to Mississippi for your education
b. go on... explain how the loch ness monster, sasquatch, the yeti, the chupacabrah, and cthulu debunk the theory of evolution (disregarding the fact that it is most likely they don't exist)

[Lord_Talron]

well, to be fair, cthulu MIGHT debunk the theory of evolution, right?

[Pwntlolz]

Originally Posted by Lord_Talron

well, to be fair, cthulu MIGHT debunk the theory of evolution, right?

H.P. Lovecraft's mind is evidence for mutation within a species

[Lord_Talron]

i love how he encouraged others to use his creations to make them seem more real

[Hey00]

And in the mean time, some students learning real stuff have to work full time to pay their enormous tuition fees... I just want to vomit when I see this kind of thing.

And on the respect thing, I respect religious beliefs the same way I respect any other unproven beliefs like the tooth fairy or the invisible pink unicorn.

[Kaiverrettu]

Originally Posted by Hey00

And in the mean time, some students learning real stuff have to work full time to pay their enormous tuition fees... I just want to vomit when I see this kind of thing.

And on the respect thing, I respect religious beliefs the same way I respect any other unproven beliefs like the tooth fairy or the invisible pink unicorn.

Except that pink unicorn is your own atheistic creation.

Christianity in the other hand, is the only true way to reach out to God.

[TwoHourMotel]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

Except that pink unicorn is your own atheistic creation.

Christianity in the other hand, is the only true way to reach out to God.

You have like 3 people asking you for scientific evidence yet you ignore all of us and comment on the least important point made (I hope you know what I mean Hey00) in this thread. Provide us scientific evidence already stop beating around the bush.

[Hey00]

Originally Posted by TwoHourMotel

You have like 3 people asking you for scientific evidence yet you ignore all of us and comment on the least important point made (I hope you know what I mean Hey00) in this thread. Provide us scientific evidence already stop beating around the bush.

I do, classic tactic: you can't refute the argument, so you attack an irrelevant detail or the form or the speaker...

As said before in this thread, that's similar to the tactic used in those schools: mask an absurdity, christian education, with an even bigger one, Nessie exists. In both cases, divert the attention toward something irrelevant.

[Lord_Talron]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

Except that pink unicorn is your own atheistic creation.

Christianity in the other hand, is the only true way to reach out to God.

Believing in the 9 divines is the only true way to reach out to akatosh, i really dont see your point

[InvokerofTime]

Originally Posted by Hey00

I do, classic tactic: you can't refute the argument, so you attack an irrelevant detail or the form or the speaker...

As said before in this thread, that's similar to the tactic used in those schools: mask an absurdity, christian education, with an even bigger one, Nessie exists. In both cases, divert the attention toward something irrelevant.

ur point is irrelevant, what is funny about this thread is that they are using an absurdity to defend an absurdity. Also,this point makes NO sense, the bigger absurdity does more damage to the speakers credibility than its worth

[Pwntlolz]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

Christianity in the other hand, is the only true way to reach out to God.

You've said that a million times and then didn't do what people told you to do a million times.

Prove it. At the very least give some sort of evidence.

[TwoHourMotel]

Kaiverrettu, I strongly suggest you watch this insightful (though a bit old) video series by Dr Richard Dawkins. It's called "Growing Up In The Universe" and it's a short lecture series that dawkins made back in 1991. It beautifully explains evolution in very simple terms (the audience are mostly children after all) that I think anybody would find quiet fascinating and interesting. Do yourself a favor and get educated. During the series, in episode 3, dawkins talks about the evolution of the eye, evolution of the wing and evolution of camouflage among many other topics.

You should really give this series a chance. It will clean up any misconceptions you have about the theory and I strongly suggest this to anybody really, these videos are that awesome.

[Hey00]

Originally Posted by InvokerofTime

ur point is irrelevant, what is funny about this thread is that they are using an absurdity to defend an absurdity. Also,this point makes NO sense, the bigger absurdity does more damage to the speakers credibility than its worth

I never said it was an effective or intelligent strategy.

[Kaiverrettu]

Originally Posted by TwoHourMotel

You have like 3 people asking you for scientific evidence yet you ignore all of us and comment on the least important point made (I hope you know what I mean Hey00) in this thread. Provide us scientific evidence already stop beating around the bush.

Well I've already given you evidence of his, Majesty's, works in the nature. How come are you so reluctant to accept physical evidence like that? Is there a certain line in what kind of evidence would you be willing to accept? Even though you said you would accept any physical evidence(if I understood right).

[TwoHourMotel]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

Well I've already given you evidence of his, Majesty's, works in the nature. How come are you so reluctant to accept physical evidence like that? Is there a certain line in what kind of evidence would you be willing to accept? Even though you said you would accept any physical evidence(if I understood right).

Huh? Where?

[Lord_Talron]

we're really, really stupid. how about holding our hands and step by step, with pictures and links show us all this physical evidence.

we're not smart enough to see this stuff with our own eyes so you'll have to show us everything yourself

[Pwntlolz]

Originally Posted by Kaiverrettu

Well I've already given you evidence of his, Majesty's, works in the nature. How come are you so reluctant to accept physical evidence like that? Is there a certain line in what kind of evidence would you be willing to accept? Even though you said you would accept any physical evidence(if I understood right).

Your evidence is as visible to me as your god.

and yes your god is not visible because your evidence is not visible

[BenderRodriguez]

Originally Posted by Lord_Talron

well, to be fair, cthulu MIGHT debunk the theory of evolution, right?

We'll find out in the 3rd millenium, when Futurama happens.

Till then, we can't say that there is no God, there is no need for a God, God hasn't created the Universe, but also saying Evolution is wrong (this statement is wrong from so many points of view, religious people saying that aren't like that because they are religious), that there is no anti-matter, that God created everything as it is, that Science=Satan.

Our understanding of the Universe is just too little for us to claim we know everything.