[Cosmetics] Enchant Totem

[Baldoro]

I totally love this Tauren's slam animation... I'm making my own map, I created a Tauren hero and I'm giving him spells playing him Slam animation cuz it looks so sweet... eh...

More Slam animation = huge T-up from me !

[king_james]

Are you sure this would go well with Enchant? I still say its better for Aftershock so you know that aftershock did trigger.

T-up though.

[MurazorOFAngmar]

t-up, actually really cool suggestion. Someone said it might be better for afterschock on the first page, I'd agree with that too.

[qlq]

T-up. I don't feel like joining the discussion on whether this is more suitable to ET or Aftershock though

[Kanashimi]

I think an animation should be added to units that receive the Enchant Toten's Bonus damage, but this one looks to good to a so insignificant skill. Rework it and maybe i could give you a 5/5.

[NoThlnG]

Quite good... So, T-Up

[TheRealTechN9NE]

Originally Posted by Pengwyn

id rather see that for aftershock IMHO, its a good animation

This .

[Necro]

I don't think Warstomp will fit, as it just signifies more AoE. It's a single target skill, so remove the slam animation and instead just add the effect on the ghoul in your picture.

[0verp0wer_BR]

TUP
A High Damage attack should look fierce!

[d3vil_slic3r]

Originally Posted by AXN

Well its good but it would be better if:

1.) player casts enchant totem, Raigor does the following:
- Slams the ground
- Warstomp effect comes out
2.) player hits an enemy (current attack animation is played)

It's better to play the slam animation of Raigor and Warstomp at the casting of the Enchant Totem since it signifies an AOE (applicable when Aftershock is learned and this is also true with Fissure, Ultimate and with Battle Fury since they have AOE attacks that's why Slam attack is justified)

Yeah I agree this.

It would be nicer if that Warstomp effect is added to animation when triggering Aftershock, but not the next hit animation (should be remained).
I like the current totem-flipping action (when hitting enemy) after triggering Enhanced totem.

It should be considered as a normal attack, just with increased damage (no magical damage, if I'm not wrong). Thus special animations are not necessary, I think

Example:
When you're doing a full ES combo (Echo Slam-> Fissure-> Enhanced Totem)
It blinks out, doing the nicest-ever looking ulti,
(current animation: Pulling his totem out of the ground)
Then it does Fissure,
(current animation: Slams the totem back to the ground)
And finally the Enhanced Totem
(current animation: It slams the ground once more, flip its totem, and does its finishing attack!)

If the totem flipping action is removed, it'll be no longer look like a finishing attack

[desOo]

It'd be useful, but enchant totem gives just +damage so it's senseless. And making it on Aftershock would be confusing ( imagine already ulti+aftershock, u won't understand anithing with all those effects)

[dominator02]

,the current has warstomp cosmetics but small stun duration,why he slams hard to stun greater but small stun duration?he should be fine to slam because it does a small stun duration.

[arcmike]

Raigor goes grand slam! T-UP!

[Zack1996]

I kinda gave up on this suggestion, but I'll try and make something for Raigor to make him look more WIN.

[vertigo12]

I agree with all the previous replies. The stun animation should be changed to the suggested animation in exchange for aftershock.

[コクーン]

I like it.

[Black.World]

just T-up.

[kowloons]

T-up the animation is good but i think the animation is too good for a skill that only adds attack
(i enjoyed your test map and i kinda killed the peon)

[Vitezkoja]

t upp

[SUperPhat]

Looks nice overall.