|
|
#1 |
Forum Staff
|
|
|
|
| Last edited by NoThlnG; 02-04-2010 at 09:34 AM. | |
|
|
#2 |
Member
|
I completely agree at the part "scourge got advantage". Ancients at the Sent side should go more south and above them there is enough space for secondary identical respawn place. I fully support this idea.
T-UP
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 822
|
I don't think the placement of Roshan really gives the Scourge so much advantage that is warrants another Roshan at another placement. He's also the only unique non-hero and non-dummy unit in the game, which is why he is unique. Creating another roshan for the sake of fulfilling an inessential need is not a good idea in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
Member
|
Quote:
But where to place the sent's ancient creep camp then? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 822
|
Quote:
Well, from a personal point of view, my point still stands. The placement where Roshan is, in my opinion, perfectly fine as it is. Creating another spawn point would seriously disrupt the current terrain on the Sentinel side: and doing this just for the purpose of creating another "possible" roshan spawn point is not worth it. But I think a test-map showing where the new roshan spawn point is in-game would be extremely helpful - if its visually fitting and not too disrupting to the terrain at the new spot, there is absolutely no reason for me not to change my point to full support
|
|
|
||
| Last edited by Mystique-; 01-19-2010 at 05:56 PM. | ||
|
|
#6 |
Member
|
Scourge doesn't get any advantage at all. It's on the Scourge half of the map, but Scourge doesn't have a shorter trip to get to it. There is no point to this, just as there is no point to having a new boss in Sentinel just for the sake of having a boss in Sentinel.
EDIT: I am wrong apparently! Scourge has a several second advantage in reaching Roshan.
__________________
Leaving the forum. It's been great and I wish you all the best.
|
|
|
| Last edited by Axidos; 01-25-2010 at 07:34 AM. | |
|
|
#7 |
Member
|
Where do you propose the symmetrical location of Rosh be for the Sentinel?
Point it out, then I have a chance to support. But seeing from now, I don't seem its necessary. What's another 10 seconds for the Sentinel to get to Rosh compared to the Sentinel. Another thing, I already believe the Sentinel has got a great jungle much more compared to the Scourge. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
Forum Staff
|
Quote:
Sentinel has got a greater jungle IMO also. But, I think that is part of the DotA that needs balances so I don't think it could be a reason for this
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
Member
|
It might be too luck based when finding the opposite team at Roshan
__________________
|
|
|
|
#10 |
Forum Staff
|
So do runes. I don't think that's a problem
__________________
|
|
|
|
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: World Down Under aka OzLand
Posts: 2,105
|
null..
instead of 2 random spawning places.. just put him somewhere at neutral point.. agree that he is a bit close to Scourge and the 1st mid tower
__________________
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
Forum Staff
|
Quote:
And I don't think Roshan can exist in there...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
Member
|
NoThInG, consider this:
- Both teams have to walk the distance from their base to the river. - Both teams then have to walk along the river to Roshan. - Both teams then have to walk the distance into Roshan's area. Whether it's on Scourge's side is irrelevant because both sides still have to walk an equal distance to get there. He could be on either side of the river or right in the middle of it and they'd still both have to walk the same distance.
__________________
Leaving the forum. It's been great and I wish you all the best.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
Forum Staff
|
Quote:
Also, Scourge can go through the pathway near the scourge secret shop So, Scourge walks less and they are more safe to kill roshan
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
Member
|
I like the idea, but if I recall there has never been a single complaint about roshing's position. I think its balanced by the fact that rosh is important, thus heavily warded and kinda detrimental to the scourge while simultaneously providing the benefit of a closer roshan. Honestly I think this would be too messy to implement.
__________________
Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.
|
|
|
|
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
|
A sentinel Ursa killing Roshan unnoticed is a very difficult task
A scourge Ursa killing Roshan unnoticed it's a sure thing |
|
|
|
#17 | |
Forum Staff
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Leaving the forum. It's been great and I wish you all the best.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 165
|
With Axe (290ms) it takes 44,5s to walk to the red cross on the ground in front of Rosh from the sentinel spawn. From the scourge spawn it takes 36s. Maybe just change the terrain around Rosh so that it's easier to access from the sentinel side, and a bit harder from the scourge side? Doesn't take much.
|
|
|
|
#20 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan, US
Posts: 201
|
I think that Roshan should be moved roughly to where the Roshan-equivalent correlates in the League of Legends map (yeah I know, blasphemer talking about LoL).
|
|