Quantum Mysticism/"The Secret" and similar.

Schafusmatus · 09-08-2010, 10:01 AM

Very interesting posts by FortyEightHours, enjoyed reading.

1. I have a question about the random generator and that 85% people got more ones than zeros, interesting would be the average difference between ones and zeros and not how many of them had more of what number. If i read correctly the random generator was a computer, you know that the computer uses a algorythm to determine random numbers? Its easy checkable if the algorythm disfunctioned because of the "influence" the people had. If the numbers were as desired than it was just "luck" that they have choosen the one as the desired number. (If they had choosen zero as their number i bet that only 15% had more zeros than ones) I would see the complete test outcomes, how often they used the generator and how many people did the test.

2. To the back in time signals, i consider the possibility that our thinking isnt the source of the command for more likely than that it sends the command back in time to cause an instant response. So the source sends one signal to the nerve and another one to the thinking part (dont know the exact word).

To the other things i have nothing to say even if they´re very interesting because they exceed my understanding.

09-08-2010, 10:01 AM	#41
Schafusmatus Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,679	Quantum Mysticism/"The Secret" and similar. Very interesting posts by FortyEightHours, enjoyed reading. 1. I have a question about the random generator and that 85% people got more ones than zeros, interesting would be the average difference between ones and zeros and not how many of them had more of what number. If i read correctly the random generator was a computer, you know that the computer uses a algorythm to determine random numbers? Its easy checkable if the algorythm disfunctioned because of the "influence" the people had. If the numbers were as desired than it was just "luck" that they have choosen the one as the desired number. (If they had choosen zero as their number i bet that only 15% had more zeros than ones) I would see the complete test outcomes, how often they used the generator and how many people did the test. 2. To the back in time signals, i consider the possibility that our thinking isnt the source of the command for more likely than that it sends the command back in time to cause an instant response. So the source sends one signal to the nerve and another one to the thinking part (dont know the exact word). To the other things i have nothing to say even if they´re very interesting because they exceed my understanding.