|
|
#1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Member
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| + | + | = | ||||
| 175 | + | 175 | + | 100 | = | 450 |
| Before: | After: |
| +4 armor | +4 armor |
| . | Indulgence (passive) |
|
|
#2 |
Member
|
Nice concept of bringing a cheap upgrade for an extremely weak item. Lovely description too. But I am afraid that the effect might be too overpowered. The first 3-4 attacks done to you(when armor bonus is 25) will hardly deal any damage. It's like a refraction for physical attacks.
I would suggest remaking the passive into something else. Something good for early laning making this item good as a starter. |
|
|
|
#3 | ||
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
Member
|
It doesn't help in laning that much. But more in ganking, where you can tank a few tower shots taking only 50 damage, helping you kill that tower hugging hero.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 940
|
It certainly does help you in laning. Cheap shots from the support VS or Warlock on the other side won't do you any harm.
On the other hand, it will also decrease creep damage if you are the one doing the harassing or attacking. But +25 armour is probably too much imo. |
|
|
|
#6 |
Member
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
Member
|
Nerfed the maximum amount of armor increased/decreased
Please remember that if you relies on it too much, your armor'll be reduced to dust in no time.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#8 |
Member
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
Member
|
Hm, to get it back from -20 to 20, you'll need 20 seconds. By that time you're long dead.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#10 |
Member
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
Member
|
Changed the condition to lower the bonus armor
![]() No more tower diving for you
__________________
|
|
|
|
#13 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 416
|
Concept : A (Awesome concept, very situational but useful in most cases)
Balance : C+ (25 is too much for such a cheap recipe both the positive and negative buff) Cosmetic : B (Very warcraftish, ingame, I dislike the name though) Overall : B+ (Need a little tweak but it's good overall)
__________________
GENERATION 22:The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 377
|
Nice concept, but needs a recipe.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#15 |
Member
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Canada,SK
Posts: 1,055
|
just make the armor to +10 and maybe give a +1 regen to help in laning a bit
|
|
|
|
#17 |
Member
|
Yes, but now it's quite weak due to the fact that nukers will rape the wielder
![]() Balancing starter item is really hard ...
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 |
Member
|
Make it such that the item won't ever give you negative armor, it will only reduce the armor given by itself.
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
Member
|
Quote:
![]() Thank you
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
Member
|
So I have 25 armor and have to take "in theory" 10 hits from Mortred to lose 10 armor?
|
|