|
|
#21 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kraków, Poland
Posts: 4,132
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
Forum Staff
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1,711
|
Thank you very much for pointing that out.
And yes, please let me know of any typos or mistakes I could have made in the first post. It's highly appreciated. |
|
|
|
#23 |
Forum Staff
|
I think we should include the the user who makes on the guides since there could be more than one guide with same topic (like hero suggesting)
__________________
|
|
|
|
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 670
|
I think having them anonymous is the correct thing to do. There is a high level of personal attachment to suggestions on this forum that is, let's say, rather ordinary. Let's keep the guides less so.
|
|
|
|
#25 |
Member
|
Scrolls of Lore's Gallery of WC3 Icons (includes beta):
Gallery Format Index Format Useful for suggestion posters, these guys already hosted the ingame icon snapshots.
__________________
Currently trapped in study limbo, spastic activity for now ![]() SUGGESTIONS: Give Lich jazzhands! Alchie needs a new Greed! Pit o' Malice needs more pizzaz! Flesh Golem/Tombstone makeover anyone? Upgrade Complete! Newbie-friendly commands! Make BH's Wind Walk synergise! Make Gnoll a Gnoll! IMPLEMENTED: Give Dirge some real disease! |
|
|
|
#26 |
Forum Staff
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1,711
|
@NoThInG: As notveryclever said, I'd rather not. The lists already have a number beside them if there are more than one on the same topic, or some of their characteristics highlighted.
@Thoby: Added both, thank you for your contribution. |
|
|
|
#27 |
Forum Staff
|
BTW, icon collections should be separated. It could be used both for hero/item suggestion + visuals and even remake suggestion
__________________
|
|
|
|
#28 |
Forum Staff
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1,711
|
I don't think such a change would hold much practical use, nor make a whole lot of sense from a conceptual point of view.
Icons are listed under "Visual" suggestions because that is where they are the most relevant: The essence of icon suggestions lies in what we concretely see, since there is no such thing as "conceptual suggestions" of this kind (It is of little use to say that an overused icon needs changing if you are not providing something concrete to replace it with). And, as we know, all suggestions regarding the change of icons belong in the "Visuals" sub-forum. However, the essence of remakes and hero suggestions lies in the actual change suggested and the conceptual content/mechanics of the hero, respectively. Aspects such as icons are of little importance (if any) in these kind of suggestions, and even when they might be a nice complement, they aren't really a substantial part of it. In concordance with what has been posted above, icons are listed under "Visual Specifics" exclusively. |
|
|
|
#29 |
Forum Staff
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#30 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 670
|
I think it shouldn't be for the same reason as the SRD Thread. I think it's quite a clever thread, but it doesn't belong here. This is more like a list of sources and aides.
__________________
Hey - it's a signature!
|
|
|
|
#31 |
Forum Staff
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1,711
|
I am rather reluctant on adding community-driven projects, or at least those which are relatively new. This is supposed to be an objetive source of information, and adding threads such as the one you suggest could lead to troubles in the future. Furthermore, the threads here are supposed to be of help, and yours is just too new as to deem it useful or useless yet.
Also, more often than not, those threads have a great level of activity when they are first created and then just decline more and more into completle inactivity. This is not good, since this list is meant to be only for definite projects. I will not sticky it now, but in some time from now I might consider it (given that the thread is still active and is actually being helpful). |
|
|
| Last edited by Jenova-; 10-31-2009 at 07:13 PM. | |
|
|
#32 |
Member
|
@NoThInG
Community "projects" aren't exactly pointed out as Useful Links (not that it isn't) Its just it's not in that category of helping out others in a way generally, but in a more specific way. |
|
|
|
#34 |
Forum Staff
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 1,711
|
Do you really consider it vital? I have never had any trouble in thinking up a name, and I don't think others do either. A suggestion can always be created without a name, and ask the community to help on that.
In any case, names are not even important to begin with. They are just a nice addition to the suggestion, like background stories or icons (in hero suggestions).
__________________
|
|
|
|
#35 |
Member
|
What about (a link to) a thread containing some few uncodeable/"IceFrog says NoNo" changes, it would help a lot.
__________________
Dynes: I don't believe you. /care
I'll hand it over to DotA 2... for now. |
|
|
|
#36 |
Forum Staff
|
You mean something like this?
http://www.playdota.com/forums/63396...odable-things/ |
|
|
|
#37 | |
Member
|
Quote:
, some "off-limits" changes if there are any.And yes please, those could really save time on suggesting something.
__________________
Dynes: I don't believe you. /care
I'll hand it over to DotA 2... for now. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 670
|
I do think that's a very useful link. Perhaps it does deserve mention.
__________________
Hey - it's a signature!
|
|
|
|
#40 |
Member
|
Thanks for this list, will surely be useful!!
__________________
Don't have access to DotA2 yet? PM me for an invite.
Fix Storm's Ultimate Targeting System. It works in DotA2, why doesn't it in Warcraft? The newbies' guide to Raijin, The Storm Spirit |
|